Sunday, June 3, 2012

Who is Guilty, my dear Vikramaditya?

A couple of years back, a Techie was arrested in Bangalore.  Charge:  Premeditated murder of his wife of just a few months.  This is how it happened.

The techie, belonging to an orthodox family, married a girl from Chennai.  The Techie was also a Tamil, working in Bangalore, and his package was Rs.24,00,000/- per annum.  The couple started their life on a very happy note.  Mother-in-law showered so much love and affection on the girl that the girl wanted mother-in-law to stay with them but she gently refused in order not to disturb their happiness and privacy.  On that fateful day, the girl was talking over phone to her parents – She was all praise for her mother-in-law, when the Calling bell rang.  She cut the phone saying she would call back. That was around 1130am.  At around 0730pm, the girl’s parents got a call from their son-in-law, the techie, saying the girl was killed by robbers.  The parents immediately started to Bangalore by Road.  By the time they reached their house, the body was taken for Post-mortem and the whole family was grief-stricken.  The girl’s parents did not know whether to control themselves or console the inconsolable son-in-law or the crying mother-in-law.  The girl was hit with a strong wooden pole behind the head and there were traces of chilli powder on her face.  Her Mangal-sutra was missing along with some other bangles and jewels.

After two days, the Police arrested the Techie for premeditated murder.  There were so many clues pointing to the complicity of the Techie.  The door was not forced open or broken.  Nobody had seen any outsiders coming or going out of the flat.  The murder had taken place between 1100 to 1300hrs, according to the Post-mortem report.  There were two cups on the Dining table and plastic containers of Coffee and Sugar were seen near the gas stove.  So the police had come to the conclusion that the visitor, who had rang the calling bell at around 1130am when the girl was talking to her parents over phone, must have been a known person.  Other rooms and almirahs were not all touched by the so called robbers.  Last, the police got the information only at 0830pm whereas the parents of the girl got the message got the message at 0730pm. 

The police asked the Techie why there was a delay of 1 hours between the two calls.  Techie told them he was confused and perplexed on seeing his wife killed by someone so he did not know what to do.  But the Police did not buy this theory.  After two days of the incident, they enquired the techie where was he on that day of the murder.  He promptly replied that he was at his office, which was around 20 Kms from the flat and he reached office by 1000hrs and came out of office only at 0600hrs.

Police went to his office for further inquiry.  In the office, they came to know that the entrance is having a CCTV camera and the recordings were kept in storage for a period of 1 month.  They called for the footages of the day of the murder.  The Techie entered into his office exactly at 0958hrs, as he had told the police.  When they fast-forwarded it, the footage also showed that the Techie left the office at 0600pm.  Suddenly one Police Officer got suspicious and wanted to see the entry and exit once again. Then the techie was caught.  The Techie entered into the Office wearing a light yellow color shirt but on exit he was wearing a Blue color shirt.  Then they patiently saw the whole recording.  Our Techie left the office at 1100hrs with the light yellow shirt and entered back with a Blue shirt at around 1300hrs.  When questioned by the Police with this evidence, he confessed to have committed the murder. 

But, what was the motive?

The Techie was in love with another lady, working in his same office, but his parents never approved of their love.  The lady in his office was so sincere in her love that she even got permission from her husband for their love and marriage afterwards.  Yes, the lady in his office was already married to someone else.  When the lady came to know about the marriage proposal, she got angry and protested to the Techie.  Our Techie, who is a decent. God-fearing, always-do-gooder, did not want to hurt anyone.  So, he told the lady that he would marry the girl from Chennai, and after sometime, he and the lady could get some on-shore assignment and settle at US, leaving the girl to her fate.  The lady also agreed to this proposal.

But immediately after the marriage, the girl’s parents wanted to register the marriage and include the name in the Passport, for which the Techie was not agreeing.  He postponed the registration telling various reasons.  By the time, the lady also got suspicious of his intentions and got pregnant through the Techie.  Then she threatened the Techie that if he got their marriage registered , then she will expose the whole truth to his family.

So the Techie decided to finish his wife and settle at US with the lady.  On that day, he came back home at around 1130hrs and when his surprised wife asked what’s the reason, he was reported to have told her some romantic reasons.  When he asked for some coffee, she went into the kitchen to make coffee when he threw chili powder on her face.  She was confused and thought it was some practical joke and went to the wash-basin to wash her face.  Suddenly the Techie hit her with a wooden pole from behind.  He was not experienced so it required a few more hits on the head.  When she fell down, he removed her jewels she was wearing and changed his blood-soaked shirt, hid it in the bed-room and locked the house and went back to office.

Now, the problem is who is at guilty.  The Techie who loved a lady who was already married, the parents who refused to accept the love affair of the son, the lady who deliberately got pregnant after the Techie’s marriage to threaten him into submission:  Who is guilty?

Psychologically speaking, we tend to cover-up the mistakes committed by our children: OK Don’t let others know this.  This breeds a mentality wherein children start to think that if it is a mistake, others should not know it.  As they grow, the belief changes into a pervert form:  If others don’t know, then it is not a mistake.

In this case, the Techie is not afraid of marrying a lady who was already married to someone else.  The only problem was he did not want his family and relatives to know about this.  The parents of the Techie did not admonish the Techie for loving a married lady, if at all they considered it to be a taboo, but did not want it to be known to others.  The lady did not bother about dismantling two marriages: One, her own and the other, the Techie’s.  All is fair in Love & War.  Is it so?

No comments:

Post a Comment